Monday, December 23, 2019

Interpretation of "In a Grove"

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Interpretation of "In a Grove". What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Interpretation of "In a Grove" paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Interpretation of "In a Grove", therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Interpretation of "In a Grove" paper at affordable prices!


An interview with Ryunosuke Akutagawa


Statement of Intent


This assignment will accentuate the important elements in Ryunosuke Akutagawa's, "In a Grove" by discussing it through an interview of what Akutagawa was trying to depict in his work. The first time I heard of the title of this story, "In a Grove," I thought that it would signify the location, which the story was set, but after I read the story a few times I realized that the title actually stood for much more than that. The title symbolized how society tends to behave, which is much like a grove, all together and acting alike. When one person tends to do something in a particular way and others see that this method benefits that person, then people begin to follow. This is what Akutagawa sees in society, their psychological "modeling" tendency and also that the human psyche prioritizes self-image over honesty. The testimonies of each of the individuals who either witnessed or took part in the murder were all filled with doubts. Every statement delivered focused on how each individual could make themselves look good in the eye of the audience and obtain their sympathy. Akutagawa ends his story with readers only knowing that Kanzawa no Takehiko had a tragic ending, but how that tragic end came to be remains unknown. This assignment is done in a form of an interview, where Akutagawa is asked to explain his work and the underlying message he is trying to portray.


CONVERSATION


Custom writing service can write essays on Interpretation of "In a Grove"


Student Good morning Mr. Ryunosuke Akutagawa. It's an honor to meet you. I am a young student who hopes to become a writer someday. I am here today hoping to get insights from the techniques you have used as a writer to represent the concepts you wish to address society, particularly in one of your best works, the short story, In a Grove.


Akutagawa Of course, of course my child. What you want to know?


Student You seem to be quite a stylistic perfectionist who favors macabre plots which is evident by the manner you create your works. What inspired you to create a story based on an interview-type scheme? Meaning creating a story that was entirely composed of monologues of witness statements or those involved in the murder themselves.


Akutagawa Monologues are very powerful instruments when it comes to story telling. It allows readers to directly, fully grasp thoughts inside a character's mind. One may argue that in the case of characters in my story, monologues were more like statements or their version of what actually occurred in the murder of a man named Kanzawa no Takehiko. However, one must also be aware that monologues allow characters to not only express their thoughts but also justify themselves in situation they are in and develop a connection with their audience.


Student Ah, I see. But why did you use characters such as the woodcutter, policeman, Buddhist priest, old woman, the wife, Tajomaru, and the murdered man to present testimonies?


Akutagawa Characters are commoners, presenting a situation more relevant to human reality. I was aiming to show fundamental skepticism of complex situations that exist in life and human relations. Using characters that were commoners in my opinion greatly does this.


Student You made each character tell their version very descriptively, giving much emotion and character. Why is this so? What are the motives of the characters?


Akutagawa Description allow readers to grasp emotions that lie within each character. Also this emphasize even more the personalities of each character as they speak their monologue, their sentiment about the tragedy, and hint as to how they really feel about all this. I also use this to incorporate cultural influence society has. You see, each character addresses their statement very honorably, showing much respect for the audience they are speaking to. This is a main feature of our culture honor. Each shows how murder is deeply grieved over. Our culture gives much weight on life and on honor. This was one aspect I was also trying to show, how individuals are concerned on mitigating themselves in order to make themselves "look good" or deviate from danger rather than really stating facts and allowing truth to be heard.


The woodcutter, Buddhist priest, policeman and old woman are not involved with the murder itself but they witnessed it. They do not tell whole truth, just what they saw. Because of their statements you are able to conclude a few things about the murder


a) Location of the murder, which is in a grove by Yamashina stage road.


b) Sequence of events of the murder


c) What the wife, husband and Tajomaru was wearing


d) Weaponry that the wife, husband and Tajomaru had.


Tajomaru is a thief. Whether he murdered the husband or not he still had to go to prison. And what better chance for a thief to enhance his ego but by admitting he committed murder? His career as a criminal would become greater!


Wife gives a statement which defends honor of the women in our culture. This is to have one man in their life. To do otherwise is dishonorable and death is more acceptable. She claims to have murdered her husband because of the loathing that she saw in his eyes. This loathing was due to her being touched by another man. This gives justification for her deed. She tries to kill herself, as she claims, but failed. This gives more confusion to her story.


Suicide in our society is not considered weak. Quite contrary, it is considered the bravest act any human can do. Takehiko spoke to show justification for his death. His wife has been violated and persuaded to leave him. She decides to do so and before leaving tells Tajomaru to kill him. Tajomaru seeing the insanity of the woman decides to leave her and after he departs she leaves too, leaving Takehiko all alone. Despairing, he felt he had no reason to live thereby justifying taking his own life.


Student Does this not create confusion? There is no narrator or narration in the story "In a Grove", rather just a summation of statements from different individuals supposedly involved in this event. One cannot fully conclude as to what actually occurred and how each individual was involved…


Akutagawa That is another one of my techniques. Create an ending which is obscure to make it even more controversially debatable. Conclusion is dependent upon the reader's interpretation of the different versions of the characters. However, this conclusion of course is based on information I permitted each character to generate so sufficient information may be at hand to formulate a somewhat logical conclusion.


Student Why "In a Grove"? Or what do you mean by it?


Akutagawa "In a Grove" stands for a few things. First that truth is usually hidden from us and this is because of how society is. Secondly, this represents how society behaves. A grove is like a bunch of similar trees and society is much like this. It tends to behave similar to one another, like how characters in a story are. They all lie to improve their self-image.


Student But what exactly are you aiming to say? There is no definite conclusion in the story.


Akutagawa I give little hints as to what really happened and what each individual's role is by placing these in statements of characters giving an idea of how the story really ends in my perspective rather than give a direct conclusion. To me, this makes my story more interesting since it seems as though story really has no end, no final outcome. The real murderer remains controversial. But this is not my point. I am trying to state truth relative to an individual's perception. It is based on the interpretation of premises given to us. After analyzing these premises, each individual comes up with his own interpretation, their own idea of what is true. I am not trying to confuse people with a non-understandable story. I am trying to make them see that truth, a very important aspect of life, is not always definite and resolved but instead is established from one's very own perception. I am trying to make people understand what truth really is and how people seem to not really appreciate the value of it over their personal gain. If one would, that person would perceive its true worth.


Student Thank you. You have been most helpful.


Akutagawa You are welcome.


Please note that this sample paper on Interpretation of "In a Grove" is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Interpretation of "In a Grove", we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Interpretation of "In a Grove" will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!